Friday, October 30, 2009
When we talk about role models there are some good ones and some bad ones obviously. When i was growing up there was a guy a few years older than me that i wanted to be exactly like, and i benefitted from knowing him personally because he did all the right things to be successful and i wanted that same thing. I think personally knowing your role model (like a parent or friend) is much more beneficial for someone growing up. You don't know what these professional athletes are doing with their actual lives, all you see is the stuff in the news and a lot of times what you see could be bad. For those people who do see pro athletes as role models they may imitate exactly what they are doing and end up getting in trouble. This kind of reminds me of the whole WWE thing where people try and imitate these superstars and end up hurting or killing themselves in the end. So in the end having a role model in close contexts i feel is much more beneficial and the way it should be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that the best role models for kids are the people closest to them such as their parents. I think that athletes though still have to act like they are a role model whether they want to be or not. They are in the spotlight and most of the the time kids want to be just like them for what they are doing playing the sport and don't often see how they act when they are not playing. I know growing up when I say my favorite athlete argue a call or something like that then I thought it was OK and did it as well and quickly found out that it is not so I understand your point on people imitating them. I think that athletes should remember that people do look up to them for what they accomplished and should act as role models.
ReplyDelete